Studio → Answers → AI disclosure
Do I have to say my content was made with AI?
It depends on the platform and on what the content shows. TikTok requires a label on realistic AI-generated images, audio and video. Meta labels such content on Instagram and Facebook. LinkedIn asks for disclosure when it isn’t obvious from context. Ordinary written posts built from your own material generally fall outside these rules.
Two different obligations, constantly confused
There are platform rules, and there are advertising rules. They come from different places, they cover different things, and the consequences for breaking them are not the same. Almost every page on this subject blends them into one paragraph, which is why so few of them are useful.
What the platforms require
The common thread: these rules are aimed at synthetic media that could be mistaken for a recording of something real. A written caption, or a designed layout over your own photograph, is not what they were built for.
What the advertising rules say
In the United States, the FTC’s position is that existing law applies without an AI carve-out: using AI to mislead people is illegal in the same way that misleading people has always been illegal. Its 2024 rule on consumer reviews and testimonials explicitly covers AI-generated fake reviews. Neither creates a general duty to announce that a post was drafted with software.
In Brazil, and this is the part most pages get wrong by assuming: there is no AI-specific disclosure rule. CONAR’s influencer-marketing guide, in force since 1 June 2026, states that advertising rules apply in full regardless of the technology used to produce or distribute the content, and says explicitly that it is not creating new disclosure duties for AI production techniques. The Consumer Defence Code has no AI provision at all. Its Article 36 requires that advertising be immediately identifiable as advertising, and Article 37 prohibits misleading advertising including by omission. Those are the rules that apply, and they applied before anyone used AI.
So the honest Brazilian answer is that you must be clear an ad is an ad, and you must not mislead. There is currently no requirement to state that AI helped make it.
What we’d do anyway
Rules are the floor. If a post shows something that didn’t happen, say so, whatever the rule says. The reason isn’t compliance, it’s that being caught implying otherwise costs more than the label ever would.
Studio’s output is built from your own material: your products, your photographs, your words. That is a large part of why the question mostly resolves quietly.
Related questions
- Does Google penalise content made with AI?
- Who owns AI-generated content?
- What is done-for-you social media content?
This is not legal advice. It’s a summary of published rules with their dates, so you can check them yourself and ask your own lawyer the right question. Sources: TikTok Newsroom (19 September 2023); Meta newsroom on labelling AI-generated content (5 April 2024, updated 23 October 2025); LinkedIn Help on content created with AI; US FTC, Operation AI Comply (25 September 2024) and the final rule on consumer reviews and testimonials (14 August 2024); CONAR’s influencer marketing guide (published 12 May 2026, effective 1 June 2026); Código de Defesa do Consumidor, Articles 36 and 37.
On disclosure.
Built from your own material.
Your products, your photographs, your words. Approved by you before anything ships.